MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412628826 · doi:10.1364/oe.566708

Thermo-optic-enabled topological optimization for tunable ultra-compact silicon photonic device design

2025· article· en· W4412628826 on OpenAlexafffund
Rebecca Rogers, Dan‐Xia Xu, Yuri Grinberg, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsOpticsPhotonicsMaterials sciencePhotonic crystalSilicon photonicsSiliconOptoelectronicsPhotonic integrated circuitPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incorporating the thermal dependency of silicon permittivity into topological inverse design methodologies opens the design space for generating novel compact optical devices with temperature actuation for dense photonic integrated circuitry. In this work, a thermo-optic-enabled topological optimization methodology for integrated photonic device design is proposed and experimentally validated through an ultra-compact optical switch. With a footprint of 10 µm by 6~µm, a tenth of the size of conventionally designed MZI-based switches, the device operates in the C-band region with comparable insertion loss (<2 dB) and ON/OFF extinction ratio (<14 dB) performance. At intermediate temperatures, the device operates as a tunable power splitter with an insertion loss below 2 dB over the wavelength range from 1532 to 1555 nm. The tunable splitter achieves various splitting ratios from 0:100 to 100:0 at 1543 nm with a 50:50 splitting ratio that can be maintained over a wavelength range of 23 nm with temperature changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207