MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412629841 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adee08

Intermingled Open and Closed Magnetic Field Lines near the Radial Origin of the Heliospheric Current Sheet

2025· article· en· W4412629841 on OpenAlexaff
F. S. Mozer, Andrii Voshchepynets, O. V. Agapitov, Kyung‐Eun Choi, Lucas Colomban, R. D. Sydora

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeliospheric current sheetCurrent sheetCurrent (fluid)PhysicsField lineMagnetic fieldMechanicsInterplanetary magnetic fieldMagnetohydrodynamicsSolar wind

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On 2024 March 30, the Parker Solar Probe crossed the heliospheric current sheet at 13 solar radii while encountering two distinctly different regions at sharp boundaries on several occasions. The two regions had very different plasma densities, electric-field spectra, and magnetic-field geometries. In one region the strahl flowed only along the direction from the Sun, and there were relatively few particles at pitch angles near 90°, while in the other region the strahl flowed both toward and away from the Sun, and there were relatively many particles at pitch angles near 90°. These different properties are interpreted as being due to the spacecraft being in the heliospheric current sheet on long open magnetic field lines in the case of unidirectional strahl flow and the spacecraft being in coronal loops having much shorter closed magnetic field lines in the case with bidirectional strahl flow. The two regions intermingled on time scales less than 100 ms to create a complex magnetic field geometry. Broadband waves were observed in the open field-line regions, while narrowband electrostatic harmonic waves were observed in both regions. These harmonic frequencies correlated with the proton plasma frequency, f pp, with the lowest frequency at ∼0.1f pp. This result, plus the field-aligned electric field waves and plasma density fluctuations, requires that the observed electrostatic mode and associated harmonics were ion acoustic waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207