MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412630199 · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-14435

Cyclic Demands on Solar Structural Joints under Wind Loading

2025· article· en· W4412630199 on OpenAlexaff
Xinlong Du, Tracy C. Becker, Zachary J. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsRowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of solar photovoltaic (PV) support structures, especially fixed-tilt structures, is typically done using equivalent static pressures, derived from static and dynamic wind load coefficients; however, the true loading on the system from wind is dynamic, with the structure undergoing many cycles. This cyclic nature of loading can lead to deterioration of the joints, even below the design wind load. With a focus on shared top-down clamps between purlins and PV module frames, this work aims to quantify the lifetime cyclic demands on these joints for the benefit of solar designers. A combination of wind hazard analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and finite element analysis (FEA) is used. Statistical distributions of wind directions and speeds based on historical wind hazard data are used to estimate durations of typical (not hurricane) wind scenarios in the lifetime of a prototype PV structure. The CFD models are first validated against wind tunnel data and then used to obtain dynamic wind pressures for wind scenarios (i.e., a certain direction and speed) not performed in the wind tunnel tests. Wind force time series are then applied to the FEA model of the PV structure, where a nonlinear spring model is used to simulate the highly nonlinear behavior of top-down clamps, to find the dynamic structural response. The FEA results demonstrate two deformation patterns between two adjacent modules (i.e., relative bending and relative twist) that govern the performance of top-down clamps; therefore, relative rotation angles are used to determine the rotational demands on the joint. Combined with wind hazard, the rotation cycle counts and amplitudes are obtained from rainflow counting, which result in the joint’s lifetime duty cycles. The results highlight the need for consideration of dynamic loading when designing PV structures, even relatively stiff fixed-tilt structures. Simplified methods for obtaining duty cycles are also proposed to facilitate practical design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Structural EngineeringSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207