MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412630360 · doi:10.14336/ad.2025.0407

Burn Injuries Accelerate Biological Aging and Increase the Epigenetically Inferred Risk of Mortality and Frailty

2025· article· en· W4412630360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAging and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health SciencesThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsMedicineGerontologyBioinformaticsIntensive care medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biological aging is closely associated with heightened disease risk, frailty, and mortality. Interestingly, physical traumas, such as burn injuries, exhibit physiological effects that resemble those of aging. However, the impact of burn injuries on biological aging remains underexplored, creating a gap in the literature that could inform better prognosis and outcomes. We conducted a prospective cohort study to investigate the effects of burn injuries on various epigenetic clocks, including HorvathAge, GrimAge, PhenoAge, and DunedinPoAm, using whole blood. The study included 59 burn patients and 25 healthy controls and was validated using a murine model of thermal injury. Our study demonstrates that burn injuries accelerate biological aging and the rate of aging, with these effects persisting for up to 28 days post-injury. The extent of biological aging was positively correlated with burn size, with severe burns resulting in an acceleration of 13-14 years in biological age as measured by GrimAge and PhenoAge-double the acceleration observed with chronic long-term smoking. This acceleration occurred irrespective of age or sex, though older patients were the most vulnerable to the aging effects of burn injuries. The role of burns as an accelerator of aging was further confirmed in mice, which exhibited the equivalent of 3-6 human years of accelerated aging (8 mouse months, or 7 human days) after the injury, reinforcing the chronic nature of the effect. Additionally, burn injuries increased epigenetically inferred risks of frailty and mortality in humans, highlighting their long-term and enduring consequences. Collectively, our findings identify burn injuries as the most significant and chronic accelerant of biological aging reported to date. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first to link burn injuries-or any form of physical trauma-to accelerated cellular and biological aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it