Sodium Oxybate as a Potential New Treatment for Catatonia in Patients With Depression, Bipolar Disorder, or a Psychotic Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catatonia is a severe psychomotor syndrome predominantly associated with depressive, bipolar, and psychotic disorders. Untreated catatonia has a 10% mortality rate and may lead to complications such as renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, pneumonia, embolism, and contractures. High doses of the benzodiazepine lorazepam, a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor modulator, are the primary pharmacological treatment, enhancing GABA's inhibitory effect, potentially reducing symptoms of catatonia. However, lorazepam is ineffective in about 25% of cases, leaving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as the only well-investigated alternative. Although often effective, ECT may have severe side effects and is not easily accepted among patients and caregivers. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapies for catatonia. Sodium oxybate, a GABA precursor and GABA-B receptor agonist, is a promising alternative treatment based on observational data, but its efficacy has never been thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium oxybate in treating catatonia unresponsive to lorazepam, while also capturing the natural course and determinants of catatonia through an observational cohort. METHODS: The Laborit trial consists of a cohort study and an embedded single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients with catatonia admitted to a psychiatric ward may join the study's cohort, where their clinical characteristics are recorded. Standard care, including lorazepam up to 24 mg/day, will be administered. On day 4, the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) will be used to measure symptom response. Patients with ≤50% improvement on the BFCRS, compared to the score at start, will be eligible for the trial. A total of 42 patients will be randomly assigned to either the sodium oxybate group, after a 2-day lorazepam reduction period, or the continuation of lorazepam. The primary endpoint is response, measured by the BFCRS score change after 4 days of treatment. A ≥50% reduction in BFCRS will define a responder, who will continue allocated treatment for an additional 10 days, with a secondary endpoint at 14 days. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol methods, with chi-square and logistic regression tests to compare group response and remission rates. RESULTS: This study was funded by the Dutch Brain Foundation (Hersenstichting) in December 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Amsterdam UMC Ethics Board on May 22, 2023. As of March 2025, the first 4 participants have been included in the cohort, with no trial participants enrolled yet. CONCLUSIONS: If positive, the results of this RCT may pave the way for international catatonia researchers and clinicians to introduce a new pharmacological treatment option for catatonia. Implementation could potentially benefit patients who endure this severe syndrome and present health care professionals with an additional treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN11236443; https://tinyurl.com/4px5s4aa. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/68356.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".