MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412633375 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86741-5_1

Overview of Military Operations in Response to Domestic Emergencies, Global Pandemics, and Civil-Military Relations

2025· book-chapter· en· W4412633375 on OpenAlexaff
Lindy Heinecken, Christian Leuprecht

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œmilitary and society · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Security and Public Health
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency responsePolitical sciencePandemicAeronauticsCivil–military relationsDisaster responseOperations researchComputer securityEngineeringLawEmergency managementMedical emergencyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Domestic military operations in democracies had historically been rare, reserved for extreme emergencies. However, the proliferation of unconventional threats, notably climate change, biosecurity hazards, and terrorism, has significantly increased the frequency, complexity, and duration of domestic deployments. This book provides a global comparative study of domestic military operations, with a specific focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. The diverse 26-country contributions investigate how varying national contexts, governmental systems, and military structures influenced these deployments, as well as the impact on civil-military relations. While the pandemic created similar demands, states responded differently, allowing for the identification of broader patterns. The research examines the legal frameworks for domestic operations, the specific roles militaries played during COVID-19 (e.g., medical support, logistics, security), and implications for civil-military relations. The case studies show that due to their readiness and organizational capacity, militaries across the globe are increasingly called on domestically as a “force of last resort.” However, extensive deployments and so-called “mission creep” are straining resources for force generation and sustainment, affecting operational readiness, especially for core combat missions. This trend challenges traditional conceptions of civil-military relations theories, raising concerns about blurred roles and professionalism. The volume draws on principal-agent theory for a more nuanced understanding of civil-military dynamics during the pandemic: political executives used the military as an agent, with heightened risk for "agency slack" or "securitization," depending on civilian oversight. The volume concludes that the armed forces need to be versatile, agile, and adaptable as "guardians of the nation" in response to the evolving security environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œmilitary and societySame topicGlobal Security and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207