MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412633597 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c02621

Predicting Interfacial Thermal Conductance and Thermal Conductivity across Multilayer TiS<sub>2</sub>/MoS<sub>2</sub> van der Waals Heterostructures Using Moment Tensor Potentials

2025· article· en· W4412633597 on OpenAlexafffund
A. K. Nair, Carlos Da Silva, Cristina H. Amon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Keywordsvan der Waals forceThermal conductivityMaterials scienceHeterojunctionThermalCondensed matter physicsConductanceTensor (intrinsic definition)Moment (physics)ThermodynamicsPhysicsMoleculeComposite materialQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal conductivity calculations using classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are significantly influenced by the selection of accurate interatomic potentials. However, these interatomic potentials are not readily available for several novel two-dimensional (2D) materials and their heterostructures. Here, we propose a machine learning interatomic potential (MLIP) and D3-dispersion correction approach to determine the out-of-plane thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal conductance of multilayer TiS 2 /MoS 2 heterostructures. We employ an MLIP-based moment tensor potential (MTP) to characterize the intralayer interactions within layers, while the interlayer interactions are characterized using the D3-dispersion correction. This approach demonstrates greater accuracy compared with Lennard-Jones-based potentials for interlayer interactions. Furthermore, this work uses a simplified supercell of the TiS 2 /MoS 2 heterostructure and cost-effective ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations with a duration of less than 1 ps. Additionally, this work investigates the effects of tuning the ratio of TiS 2 to MoS 2 layers on the interfacial thermal conductance and the overall out-of-plane thermal conductivity of the multilayer heterostructure. This MLIP-based methodology provides a reliable approach for estimating the thermal properties of multilayer heterostructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207