MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412635765 · doi:10.7202/1118524ar

Musique, journalisme et justice sociale : Paris entre les révolutions (1830-1851)

2025· article· fr· W4412635765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’un des moyens de propagation de la philosophie de Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier se fit à travers la publication de deux périodiques : La Phalange , publié de 1836 à 1843, puis La Démocratie pacifique , publié de 1843 à son arrêt au début du Second Empire en novembre 1851. Dès le début, les publications proposèrent non seulement des comptes rendus sur l’actualité des concerts et des événements scéniques, mais aussi des essais plus discursifs sur la musique. À partir de 1838, le critique Allyre Bureau est au coeur de cette activité. Il rédige deux articles par mois pendant la décennie suivante et au-delà. Les textes de ses collègues et les siens dans La Phalange et La Démocratie pacifique rapprochent la musique de la philosophie des fouriéristes. L’article analyse ces rapprochements et le discours social et musical qui se déploie au sein des deux journaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it