MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412636425 · doi:10.4000/14f7q

Successful Establishment Requirements within Canada’s Refugee Resettlement System: Historic Trajectory and Implications

2025· article· en· W4412636425 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sasha Baglay

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeTrajectoryPolitical sciencePublic administrationEnvironmental planningGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the changing role of successful establishment requirements within Canada’s refugee system from 1945 to the present. The trajectory of these requirements is traced through three historic periods: (a) 1945 to 1978, when there was no dedicated refugee stream; (b) 1978 to 2002, when Canada incorporated the Refugee Convention definition; and (c) 2002 to the present, when the new Immigration and Refugee Protection Act came into force and an Economic Mobility Pathway Pilot (EMPP) for skilled refugees was introduced. This trajectory demonstrates ongoing tensions between pragmatic and protection considerations in Canada’s resettlement approach, which impact both access to protection and the notion of “refugee” in the context of third country solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207