MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412636592 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70384

Combined revision ACL reconstruction with slope‐correction osteotomy and lateral extra‐articular tenodesis improves stability in patients with high posterior tibial slope and pivot shift

2025· article· en· W4412636592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsFowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLachman testAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionOrthopedic surgeryAnterior cruciate ligamentSurgeryHigh tibial osteotomyOsteotomyTibiaRadiographyPatellar tendonOrthodonticsOsteoarthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing single‐stage revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with bone‐patellar tendon‐bone (BPTB) autograft, anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (ACWPTO) and lateral extra‐articular tenodesis (LET). Methods An institutional review board‐approved retrospective study of all patients who underwent a revision ACLR using a BPTB autograft, ACWPTO and LET from a single centre from 2018 to 2023 was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients >18 years of age with a failed ACLR, posterior tibial slope (PTS) of >15°, previous ACL‐tunnel diameters of <14 mm, and intact ipsilateral patellar tendon. PTS and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using the mechanical axis on long weight‐bearing lateral tibial radiographs. Results Nine patients, all men, were evaluated with a mean age of 31.1 years and a mean follow‐up of 31.4 months. The PTS significantly decreased from 16.8° (range: 15.1°–18.9°) preoperatively to 9.3° (range: 5.0°–14.7°) post‐operatively ( p < 0.001) and ATT significantly decreased from 14.6 mm (range: 10.7–19.0 mm) preoperatively to 6.3 mm (range: 1.3–11.5 mm) post‐operatively ( p < 0.001). Preoperatively, all patients showed significant instability with the Lachman test Grade 2/3 and the pivot shift test Grade 2/3. Post‐operatively, Lachman test grade was 0 and Pivot shift test grade was 0 in all patients ( p < 0.01), and the average post‐operative subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 79.4 (range: 60.9–95.4). Conclusions Single‐stage revision ACLR using BPTB autograft, ACWPTO and LET in an ACL‐deficient knee with high‐grade pivot shift and increased PTS was safe and reliable, with significantly improved clinical and objective outcomes. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it