Deep Learning to Differentiate Parkinsonian Syndromes Using Multimodal <scp>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</scp> : A Proof‐of‐Concept Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The differentiation between multiple system atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson's disease (PD) based on clinical diagnostic criteria can be challenging, especially at an early stage. Leveraging deep learning methods and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data has shown great potential in aiding automatic diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the feasibility of a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN)-based approach using multimodal, multicentric MRI data for differentiating MSA and its variants from PD. METHODS: MRI data were retrospectively collected from three MSA French reference centers. We computed quantitative maps of gray matter density (GD) from a T1-weighted sequence and mean diffusivity (MD) from diffusion tensor imaging. These maps were used as input to a 3D CNN, either individually ("monomodal," "GD" or "MD") or in combination ("bimodal," "GD-MD"). Classification tasks included the differentiation of PD and MSA patients. Model interpretability was investigated by analyzing misclassified patients and providing a visual interpretation of the most activated regions in CNN predictions. RESULTS: The study population included 92 patients with MSA (50 with MSA-P, parkinsonian variant; 33 with MSA-C, cerebellar variant; 9 with MSA-PC, mixed variant) and 64 with PD. The best accuracies were obtained for the PD/MSA (0.88 ± 0.03 with GD-MD), PD/MSA-C&PC (0.84 ± 0.08 with MD), and PD/MSA-P (0.78 ± 0.09 with GD) tasks. Patients misclassified by the CNN exhibited fewer and milder image alterations, as found using an image-based z score analysis. Activation maps highlighted regions involved in MSA pathophysiology, namely the putamen and cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings hold promise for developing an efficient, MRI-based, and user-independent diagnostic tool suitable for differentiating parkinsonian syndromes in clinical practice. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".