Pengembangan Pariwisata Dengan Pendekatan Community Based Tourism (CBT) Di Desa Wera, Kecamatan Pamona Puselemba, Kabupaten Poso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to formulate a sustainable tourism development strategy involving the community of Wera Village. The research employed a mixed-methods approach to understand the village's potential and tourist needs. The research results are outlined in four main strategies: (1) optimizing natural potential as the main attraction, (2) improving the quality and quantity of supporting tourism facilities, (3) utilizing digital technology for more effective promotion, and (4) empowering the community through training and active participation in management. Based on the research results, several strategic steps are recommended. First, the local government needs to allocate sufficient funds for the development of tourism infrastructure and facilities. Second, continuous training programs must be implemented to enhance the community's capacity in managing the tourism sector. Third, comprehensive regulations are needed to regulate tourism activities and protect the environment. Finally, increasing public awareness of the importance of environmental sustainability and culture, as well as their active participation in tourism management, is essential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".