MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412642129 · doi:10.7717/peerj.19673

GEDTM30: global ensemble digital terrain model at 30 m and derived multiscale terrain variables

2025· article· en· W4412642129 on OpenAlexaff
Yu-Feng Ho, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, John B. Lindsay, H.I. Reuter, Leandro Parente, Martijn Witjes, Tomislav Hengl

Bibliographic record

VenuePeerJ · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsDigital elevation modelTerrainLidarMean squared errorStandard deviationRemote sensingLand coverElevation (ballistics)RangingMathematicsGeographyGeodesyStatisticsCartographyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production and validation of an open global ensemble digital terrain model (GEDTM30) and derived terrain variables at 1 arc-s spacing grid ($\sim$30 m spatial resolution) is described. Copernicus DEM, ALOS World3D, and object height models were combined in a data fusion approach to generate a globally consistent digital terrain model (DTM). This DTM was then used to compute 15 standard terrain variables across six scales (30, 60, 120, 240, 480 and 960 m). A global-to-local transfer learning model framework with 5° × 5° tiling leveraged globally distributed lidar datasets: ICESat-2 ATL08 (best-fit terrain height) and GEDI02 (lowest mode elevation), totaling over 30 billion training points. A global model was initially fitted using ICESat-2 and GEDI, followed by locally optimized models per tile, ensuring both global consistency and local accuracy. Independent validation shows that GEDTM30 reduces Copernicus DEM RMSE by about 25.4% in built-up areas, 10.0% in regions with 10–50% tree cover, and 27.3% in areas with over 50% tree cover. Compared to state-of-the-art DTMs (MERIT DEM, FABDEM and FathomDEM), GEDTM30 achieves the lowest vertical errors when assessed with GNSS station records, yielding a standard deviation of 7.77 m, an RMSE of 10.69 m, and a mean error of 7.34 m. FathomDEM exhibited the lowest vertical RMSE when validated against independent reference DTMs. GEDTM30 was further used to generate multiscale variables of topography and hydrology through an optimized tiling workflow ($\sim$800 tiles of 600 × 600 km with $\sim$16% overlap) based on the Equi7 grid system. The entire workflow was implemented in Python using GDAL and Whitebox Workflows. Visual inspection confirmed the absence of boundary artifacts and the preservation of hydrologic connectivity. The tiling-based implementation significantly reduces computational costs of generating large-scale DTMs and derived terrain variables. The GEDTM30 dataset and code are publicly available as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs via Zenodo and the OpenLandMap STAC. Further fusion with local lidar-based DTMs and national DTMs is recommended to enhance local accuracy and level of detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeerJSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207