The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing the Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing the occupational health and safety of workers within Oman context. Study design: A quantitative approach was used to collect and analyse data on participants’ perceptions, on benefits, challenges, and preferences among professionals engaged in safety. Methodology: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 125 health and safety professionals across selected workplace in Oman. The study sample included engineers, healthcare professionals, and health and safety practitioners who use artificial intelligence within their daily tasks. The study sample was chosen purposively. SPSS software version 26.0 was used to analyze quantitative data. Results: The results of this study indicate a wide support for the deployment of Artificial Intelligence within safety management domain, with some concerns regarding privacy, data reliability, and job security. There were no statistically significant differences in perception among participants roles, indicating consistent views on AI adoption in the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) domain. However, the results might have been influenced by the predominance of younger more technologically savvy participants. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence is considered a valuable addition to Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) systems in Oman, and by extension, in the GCC and the world. To guarantee an effective integration of AI into OHS in Oman, it is essential to establish national training and readiness initiatives to enhance workforce skills and digital proficiency across various sectors. This study proposes a clear roadmap for the deployment of AI within OHS in Oman by highlighting the relevant concerns. It also provides practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners in support of safer and more resilient workplaces while incorporating advanced technologies into OHS practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it