Cost impact of balloon guide catheter with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Analysis from the United States, Canada, and seven European countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundBalloon guide catheters (BGCs) are adjunctive devices that may be used during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to induce flow arrest and improve clot retrieval and reperfusion outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. As the cost-effectiveness of BGC use remains uncertain, this study assessed short- and long-term direct healthcare costs associated with BGC use versus standard guide catheters (SGC) during MT.MethodsA decision tree model estimated the short-term costs (index hospitalization), long-term costs (one year after index hospitalization), and total costs for patients undergoing MT + BGC versus MT + SGC from a healthcare system perspective in the United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Average device costs were sourced from public tender prices and market research data. Weighted average healthcare costs for modified Rankin Scale scores were sourced from published literature for the respective countries. A 2024 meta-analysis supporting improved outcomes with BGC provided input parameters to model treatment effects for BGC and SGC. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of model parameters and accounted for uncertainty.ResultsAcross all countries, long-term and total per-patient costs were lower with MT + BGC, yielding total per-patient cost savings of $6297 (US), CAD 3006 (Canada), £1828 (UK), 28,950 kr (Sweden), €1077 (Germany), €709 (Italy), €3678 (Spain), €2259 (Belgium), and €3344 (The Netherlands). The probability of MT + BGC yielding cost savings ranged 0.356-0.911 (short term), 0.962-0.975 (long term), and 0.838-0.935 (total costs). While long-term and total costs consistently favored MT + BGC, short-term cost savings showed more variability across countries.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that BGC use is associated with total one-year per-patient cost savings for inpatient and postdischarge stroke care across the US, Canada, and seven European healthcare systems. Balloon guide catheters can potentially reduce post-stroke care costs and should be considered more broadly, despite the additional cost incurred by the device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".