MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412647247 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v3i1.61979

Constructions of small complete arcs with prescribed symmetry

2008· article· en· W4412647247 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Petr Lisoněk, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsSymmetry (geometry)CombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use arcs found by Storme and van Maldeghem in their classification of primitive arcs in PG(2,q) as seeds for constructing small complete arcs in these planes. Our complete arcs are obtained by taking the union of such a seed arc'' with some orbits of a subgroup of its stabilizer. Using this approach we construct five different complete 15-arcs fixed by \Z3 in PG(2,37), a complete 20-arc fixed by §3 in PG(2,61), and two different complete 22-arcs fixed by \D5 in PG(2,71). In all three cases, the size of complete arcs constructed in this paper is strictly smaller than the size of the smallest complete arcs (in the respective plane) known so far.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicStructural Analysis of Composite MaterialsFrench-language works237,207