MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412647853 · doi:10.1017/9781009381468.010

Viscid Hydrodynamics

2025· book-chapter· en· W4412647853 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter returns to the zero-field limit of MHD replacing the isotropic pressure force density in ideal HD with force densities arising from the viscous stress tensor for viscid HD . As tensor analysis is not a prerequisite for this course, the stress tensor is developed purely from a vector analysis of all stresses applied at a single point in a viscid fluid. This leads to the introduction of bulk and kinetic viscosity in a Newtonian fluid and the identification of ordinary thermal pressure with the trace of the stress tensor. Various flavours of the Navier–Stokes equation are developed including compressible and incompressible forms. The Reynold’s number is introduced as a result of scaling the Navier–Stokes equation which leads to a qualitative discussion on turbulent and laminar flow . Numerous examples are given in which a simplified form of the Navier–Stokes equation can be solved analytically, including plane-parallel flow , open channel flow , Hagen–Poiseuille flow , and Couette flow .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207