MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412647871 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v2i1.61917

A proof of an extension of the icosahedral conjecture of Steiner for generalized deltahedra

2007· article· en· W4412647871 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dániel Bezdek

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsConjectureIcosahedral symmetryExtension (predicate logic)Steiner systemSteiner tree problemCombinatorial proofDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this note we introduce a new family of convex polyhedra which we call the family of generalized deltahedra or in short, the family of g-deltahedra. Here a g-deltahedron is a convex polyhedron in Euclidean 3-space whose each face is an edge-to-edge union of some triangles each being congruent to a given regular triangle. Steiner’s famous icosahedral conjecture (1841) says that among all convex polyhedra isomorphic to an icosahedron (that is having the same face structure as an icosahedron) the regular icosahedron has the smallest isoperimetric quotient. In this paper we prove that the regular icosahedron has the smallest isoperimetric quotient among all g-deltahedra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207