MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412650814 · doi:10.5038/2074-1235.53.1.1631

Thick-Billed Murres <i>Uria lomvia</i> at Cape Parry, Northwest Territories: Core-use Areas, Morphometrics and Chick Diets

2025· article· en· W4412650814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosana Paredes, J. B. Stephen, Piia Kortsalo

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine ornithology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdCapeOrnithologyMorphometricsPARRYBiologyOceanographyFisheryEcologyZoologyGeographyArchaeologyGeologySouthern HemispherePredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cape Parry is home to the only colony of Thick-billed Murres Uria lomvia in the western Canadian Arctic, but ecological information for this small, isolated population is lacking. To address this information gap, we investigated the spatial distribution, diving behaviour, diet, and morphometrics of male and female Cape Parry Thick-billed Murres during the breeding season. We tracked 23 chick-rearing adults (seven females and 16 males) using Global Positioning System (GPS) tags with depth sensors (2021) and collected chick diet data (2021, 2022) using observations and photos. Cape Parry murres foraged relatively close to the colony (4.5 ± 3.3 km) and mostly within the marine boundaries of the Anguniaqvia Niqiqyuam Marine Protected Area (ANMPA). Core-use foraging areas (50% utilization distribution [UD] of dive locations) and diving depths (up to 70 m) coincided with the relatively shallow waters near Cape Parry. There was no difference between sexes in foraging locations, but there was a clear difference between sexes in foraging times, as has been reported in other studies. Dive bouts at night, mostly performed by males, consisted of more frequent, shallower dives compared with daylight diving. Dive bout duration and calculation of murre diving efficacy suggest foraging effort (“time spent feeding”) was similar between day and night. Adults delivered fish up to 142 mm in length to their chicks, with a majority (81%‒90%) consisting of pelagic Arctic Cod Boreogadus saida, benthic Daubed Shanny Leptoclinus maculatus, and benthic Sandlance Ammodytes spp., with a higher proportion of Artic Cod delivered in 2022 compared to 2021. Morphometric measurements placed Cape Parry females closer to Atlantic than Pacific colonies, and Cape Parry males were positioned between the two geographic groups. In summary, this study provides the first spatial and foraging ecology data for the Cape Parry population of Thick-billed Murres, which is crucial for management and evaluating the adequacy of the ANMPA in supporting this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine ornithologySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207