MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412654522 · doi:10.4166/kjg.2025.047

Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Presenting as Diarrhea and Weight Loss: A Case Report and Literature Review.

2025· review· en· W4412654522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Woo Jin Kim, Jin Ook Jang, Cheol Min Lee, Su Bin Synn, Su Bum Park

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPusan National University Hospital
KeywordsMedicineWeight lossDiarrheaDermatologyEnteropathyHair lossHyperpigmentationAzathioprineDifferential diagnosisProtein losing enteropathyMalnutritionPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicinePathologyDiseaseObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare, non-hereditary disorder characterized by diffuse, non-neoplastic gastrointestinal polyposis along with ectodermal abnormalities, such as alopecia, skin hyperpigmentation, and nail dystrophy. It typically affects individuals aged >50 years and can lead to severe complications, including protein-losing enteropathy, chronic diarrhea, and malnutrition, if not diagnosed early. We report the case of a 68-year-old male who presented with a 2-month history of diarrhea, weight loss, and hair loss. Endoscopic and histopathological examinations revealed diffuse polyposis throughout the gastrointestinal tract, consistent with CCS findings. The patient was treated with a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine, which led to marked clinical and endoscopic improvements. No recurrence was observed during 1 year of follow-up period. This case highlights the importance of recognizing the typical clinical and diagnostic features of CCS. Owing to its nonspecific presentation, diagnosis may be delayed, potentially worsening the prognosis. Therefore, CCS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of middle-aged or older patients who present with multiple gastrointestinal polyps accompanied by ectodermal symptoms. Early recognition and appropriate immunosuppressive therapy are essential for improving patient outcomes and preventing complications. Long-term surveillance is necessary because of the potential for polyp recurrence or malignant transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→