Comparative genomics of <i>Pseudomonas paraeruginosa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The PA7-clade (or group 3) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is now recognized as a distinct species, Pseudomonas paraeruginosa . We report here the genomic sequences of six new strains of P. paraeruginosa : Zw26 (the first complete genome of a cystic fibrosis isolate of P. paraeruginosa ) , draft genomes of four burn and wound strains from Argentina very closely related to PA7, and of Pa5196, the strain in which arabinosylation of type IV pili was documented. We compared the genomes of 82 strains of P. paraeruginosa and confirmed that the species is divided into two sub-clades. Core genomes are very similar, while most differences are found in “regions of genomic plasticity” (RGPs). Several genomic deletions were identified, and most are common to the CR1 sub-clade that includes Zw26 and Pa5196. All strains lack the type 3 secretion system (T3SS) and instead use an alternative virulence strategy involving an exolysin, a characteristic shared with group 5 P . aeruginosa . All strains tend to be multiresistant like PA7, with a significant proportion of carbapenem-resistant strains, either oprD mutants or carrying carbapenemase genes. Although P. paraeruginosa is still relatively rare, it has a worldwide distribution. Its multiresistance and its alternative virulence strategy need to be considered in future therapeutic development. IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogen causing respiratory infections, notably in cystic fibrosis, and burn and wound infections. Our study reports six new genomes of Pseudomonas paraeruginosa , a new species recently reported as distinct from P. aeruginosa . The number of sequenced genomes of P. paraeruginosa is only about 1% that of P. aeruginosa . We compare the genomic content of nearly all strains of P. paraeruginosa in GenBank, highlighting the differences in core and accessory genomes, antimicrobial resistance genes, and virulence factors. This novel species is very similar in environmental spectrum to P. aeruginosa but is notably resistant to last-line antibiotics and uses an alternative virulence strategy based on exolysin—this strategy being shared with some P. aeruginosa outliers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".