Characterizing the response time of unpumped oxygen optodes for profiling applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The response times of the Aanderaa 4330, Aanderaa 4330 WTW, RBR coda T.ODO|slow, and PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB were evaluated in the laboratory over a range of profiling speeds at two temperatures. The PyroScience PICO‐O2‐SUB had the fastest response time (1–4 s), followed by the RBR coda T.ODO|slow (~ 15–35 s), Aanderaa 4330 (~ 30–60 s), and Aanderaa 4330W (~ 50–100 s). This study provides recommendations on improving the quality of oxygen data from optodes in profiling applications by additionally assessing the impact of response time testing setups, thermal inertia effects, and foil types on sensor response times. This study provides a new response time function based on physical principles to predict response time for these four optode types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".