MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412656413 · doi:10.1080/15732479.2025.2531397

Improvements in forecasting and normalizing limited displacement responses of long-span steel bridges subjected to seasonal temperature variability

2025· article· en· W4412656413 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Entezami, Bahareh Behkamal, Carlo De Michele, Stefano Mariani

Bibliographic record

VenueStructure and Infrastructure Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsMitacs
FundersEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsSpan (engineering)Displacement (psychology)Structural engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local displacements of large-scale bridges bring important information for structural health monitoring. Remote sensing through satellites and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery displays significant opportunities to provide these displacements. However, challenges such as restricted access to images, inability to perform real-time monitoring akin to vibration-based SHM, and difficulties posed by large sizes and speckle noise of SAR images complicate their use in long-term monitoring programs. Environmental variability, especially seasonal temperature changes, can also influence displacements masking actual impacts of damage. To address these challenges, an innovative stacking ensemble regression method is proposed to simultaneously forecast and normalize small datasets of displacement responses retrieved from limited SAR images. This method comprises two levels of non-parametric base regressors and a parametric meta regressor trained by the predictions of the base learners along with the original response data. The base regressors are univariate, robust, and Bayesian linear regression models, while the meta regressor is developed from the ridge regression. The effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method are demonstrated through limited temperature and displacement samples of two large-scale steel bridges. Results show high prediction accuracy and successful normalization capabilities of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructure and Infrastructure EngineeringSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207