MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412656547 · doi:10.36814/pgr.2024.35.02

Food and seed productivity of alfalfa germplasm under increased soil acidity

2024· article· en· W4412656547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. D. Bugayov, V. M. Horenskyy

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetičnì resursi roslin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmProductivityAgronomyEnvironmental scienceAgroforestryBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Goal. To assess the feed and seed productivity of alfalfa starting material of different eco-geographical origins. Results and Discussion. Based on results of studies of alfalfa germplasm of different eco-geographical origins under natural increased acidity of the soil solution (pH 5.2-5.3), promising starting materials were identified; they were superior to the check variety, ‘Syniukha’, in terms of feed productivity (which was higher by 7-92% or 0.07-0.9 kg/m²) and seed productivity (which was higher by 8-79% or 2.7-26.8 g/m²) in two years of using the grass canopy. We observed that most of the studied accessions (for example, ‘Radoslava’, ‘Aliia’ and others) showed their maximum feed productivity in the first year of using the grass canopy (2021), while in the second year, the feed productivity was slightly reduced, despite improved wetting. However, some of the collection acessions responded positively to this factor and, accordingly, the dry matter output was slightly higher than in the first year of using the grass canopy (‘Elehiia’, ‘Intryha’, ‘Mariskabul’, etc.). It should also be noted separately the heterogeneity of seed formation by plants of the collection accessions. Some yielded relatively stably over the years, others reached the maximum productivity in the first year of using, while in the next year with better conditions, on the contrary, their productivity decreased, apparently because of depletion of the root layer for certain nutrients; most of the accessions showed their maximum productivity in the second year of using. Conclusions. Based on the results of assessments, valuable starting materials were identified; they showed sufficiently high feed and seed productivities: ‘Radoslav’a (Ukraine), ‘Synia 2’ (Ukraine), ‘Elehiia’ (Ukraine), ‘Zaikevycha’ (Ukraine), ‘Mediya’ (Russia), ‘Flandria’ (France), ‘Cordoba’ (Argentina), ‘Mariskabul’ (Bulgaria), ‘Ferax 58’ (Canada), ‘Grilys-1’ (clone No. 3) (Sweden), ‘Mistseva’ (Brazil), and ‘Mistseva’ (Turkey). These accessions are proposed for use in breeding when creating purple medic varieties that would be tolerant to increased soil acidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetičnì resursi roslinSame topicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsFrench-language works237,207