Towards Simplifying Electrical Machine Design with Automated CAD Component Identification using Mask RCNN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The state-of-the-art design processes for electrical machines (eMachine) are template-based methods and design from scratch approaches. Over the past four decades, significant advancements have been made to make these methods effective in terms of electromagnetic performance. However, the state-of-the-art cannot provide information on the topology and the components of an eMachine from a given non-parametrized computer aided design (CAD). This information is imperative for the automatic selection of an appropriate simulation profile to meet the required KPIs, enhancing the numerical computation of electromagnetic fields, and improving the user experience through an improved user interface. Moreover, it can be used to generate a parametric version of a given CAD design, which can subsequently be utilized by an optimization tool for geometric refinement and optimal material selection. The first step to achieve this is recognizing the components and their relative special positioning. This paper uses Mask RCNN, an object detection technique, to identify the components of an eMachine from a CAD design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".