MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantum Computing Threats to IEC 62351 Cryptographic Algorithms: An In-Depth Analysis

2025· preprint· en· W4412660026 on OpenAlexafffund
Brian Goncalves, Arash Mahari, Atefeh Mashatan, Mohammadreza F. M. Arani, Marthe Kassouf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecToronto Metropolitan University
FundersMitacsHydro-Québec
KeywordsCryptographyComputer scienceQuantum computerAlgorithmComputer securityTheoretical computer scienceQuantumPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum computing, power systems, and communication represent three distinct fields that converge to address the complexities involved in the quantum cybersecurity of power systems. Quantum computers present a serious threat to cybersecurity by potentially affecting traditional encryption methods, which could compromise sensitive data and disrupt the integrity of secure communications. As communication and data transformation serve as the backbone of modern power grid monitoring, control, and protection systems, the growing awareness of cyber-vulnerabilities in power grids has made cybersecurity a pressing concern. The IEC 62351 standard family has been developed to provide security recommendations for various power system communication protocols and is emerging as a leading cybersecurity standard for power systems. However, the vulnerabilities of these standards to quantum threats have yet to be fully explored. This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of security threats and vulnerabilities in modern power systems against quantum attacks. It systematically reviews the security considerations outlined in IEC 62351 for safeguarding various aspects, such as IEC 61850 messages, key management, XML file security, and TCP/IP profiles. The analysis reveals that almost all encryption algorithms mandated and recommended by IEC 62351 are vulnerable to quantum attacks such as Grover's and Shor's algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207