MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412661672 · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119557

High-resolution record of global cooling during a large Mississippian positive carbon isotope excursion

2025· article· en· W4412661672 on OpenAlexaff
Noah Anderson, Kristin Bergmann, Matthew G. Braun, Elizabeth M. Griffith, Matthew R. Saltzman

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Planetary Science Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersDivision of Earth SciencesUniversity of IowaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExcursionGeologyIsotopes of carbonPaleontologyIsotopeCarbon fibersResolution (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kinderhookian-Osagean Boundary Excursion (KOBE) is among the largest positive carbon isotope excursions in the Phanerozoic Eon, but the temporal relationship between the KOBE and global cooling is not well understood. Previous attempts to establish connections between perturbations to the carbon cycle and global climate were hampered by the need to assume seawater δ 18 O values, a reliance on fossils with incomplete stratigraphic distribution, and disagreement between records from conodonts and brachiopods. Here, we present a high-resolution clumped isotope record from a Lower Mississippian section from north-central Iowa. When considered in the context of facies changes and evidence of diagenesis, these data show that a positive shift in δ 13 C—possible evidence of increased organic carbon burial—precedes cooling of 5–7 °C, and provides a maximum constraint on global ice volume of slightly less than modern quantities in the prelude to the main phase of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. This evidence supports hypotheses that the KOBE was the result of a change in organic carbon burial dynamics (upland plant expansion, deep basin burial, expanded suboxia) rather than those that posit that initial cooling led to enhanced carbon burial. We demonstrate that clumped isotope analyses of bulk carbonate rocks from shallowly buried, open-marine environments that experienced early cementation provide complementary constraints to existing paleoclimate proxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Planetary Science LettersSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207