Catheter-based polarimetric imaging to complement MRI for deep brain stimulation neurosurgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for movement disorders and other neurological conditions. Accurate localization of small deep brain nuclei, such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal pallidum (GPi), is crucial for successful DBS outcomes. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), commonly used for DBS planning, lacks the resolution and contrast needed to directly delineate these target structures. Aim: We aim to explore the potential of catheter-based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) as a complementary imaging tool for high-resolution visualization of tissue surrounding the DBS insertion trajectory. Approach: We simulated DBS implantation surgery at three targets in a post-mortem nonhuman primate head. PS-OCT, using advanced reconstruction algorithms for absolute depth-resolved birefringence, was compared with MRI for its ability to visualize and differentiate structural details. Results: PS-OCT provided more detailed and accurate structural information than MRI while maintaining consistency with MRI results. Its compact form factor and imaging paradigm integrate seamlessly into the surgical workflow, offering new insights for intraoperative decision-making. Conclusions: studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it