MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412670453 · doi:10.55041/isjem04887

Voices on the Screen : Gender Equity and Women's Media Presence in India

2025· article· en· W4412670453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender equityEquity (law)Gender studiesPsychologySociologyAdvertisingPolitical scienceBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite constitutional guarantees and existing policy frameworks in India, the media continues to exhibit gender bias. Women remain underrepresented in newsroom leadership, media ownership, and as subjects in news stories. Their portrayal is often stereotypical, reinforcing regressive narratives by limiting women to traditional roles or objectifying them, particularly in television, film, and news reporting. News coverage tends to focus on the character of female victims rather than addressing systemic issues, and female experts in politics, science, and public life rarely receive the same visibility as their male counterparts. Though some media organizations have introduced editorial guidelines for fair representation, implementation is sporadic and largely unmonitored. The rise of digital and social media platforms has added new challenges, including cyber harassment and the unchecked spread of patriarchal content. Compared to global standards set by institutions like UNESCO and initiatives in Nordic countries or Canada, India lags significantly behind. These international models emphasize transparency, mandatory gender-sensitive training, equitable leadership, and accountability—areas where Indian media remains deficient due to a lack of political will, regulatory enforcement, and industry-wide commitment. The paper proposes a comprehensive set of measures to bridge these gaps. These include establishing regulatory oversight through a Gender Equality Commission for Media, making gender sensitization training mandatory for media professionals, integrating gender studies into journalism education, and incentivizing content that promotes gender equity. It also recommends increasing women’s representation in decision-making roles within media organizations and launching public awareness campaigns to promote media literacy and demand for inclusive content. Further, it calls for independent research bodies to monitor gender representation and collaboration with international agencies for better practices. In the digital space, stricter moderation policies, legal protections against online abuse, and support structures for women content creators are vital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Scientific Journal of Engineering and ManagementSame topicSouth Asian Cinema and CultureFrench-language works237,207