MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412673659 · doi:10.1145/3731148

Shape Space Spectra

2025· article· en· W4412673659 on OpenAlexafffund
Chang Yue, Otman Benchekroun, Maurizio M. Chiaramonte, Peter Yichen Chen, Eitan Grinspun

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Graphics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceComputer graphics (images)GeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eigenanalysis of differential operators, such as the Laplace operator or elastic energy Hessian, is typically restricted to a single shape and its discretization, limiting reduced order modeling (ROM). We introduce the first eigenanalysis method for continuously parameterized shape families. Given a parametric shape, our method constructs spatial neural fields that represent eigen-functions across the entire shape space. It is agnostic to the specific shape representation, requiring only an inside/outside indicator function that depends on shape parameters. Eigenfunctions are computed by minimizing a variational principle over nested spaces with orthogonality constraints. Since eigenvalues may swap dominance at points of multiplicity, we jointly train multiple eigenfunctions while dynamically reordering them based on their eigenvalues at each step. Through causal gradient filtering , this reordering is reflected in backpropagation. Our method enables applications to operate over shape space, providing a single ROM that encapsulates vibration modes for all shapes, including previously unseen ones. Since our eigenanalysis is differentiable with respect to shape parameters, it facilitates eigenfunction-aware shape optimization. We evaluate our approach on shape optimization for sound synthesis and locomotion, as well as reduced-order modeling for elastodynamic simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on GraphicsSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207