MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412674776 · doi:10.59465/jpht.v15i2.835

Fenologi Pembungaan Rhizophora mucronata Lamk. di Hutan Mangrove Pasuruan, Jawa Timur

2018· article· id· W4412674776 on OpenAlexaff
Liliana Baskorowati, Subagya Subagya, Mohammad Sultan Mahmud, Mudji Susanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizophora mucronataMangroveRhizophoraForestryRhizophoraceaeBiologyGeographyBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhizophora mucronata Lamk. merupakan jenis tanaman mangrove yang dikembangkan untuk program rehabilitasi areal pantai utara Pulau Jawa. Informasi mengenai produksi propagula R. mucronata menjadi penting agar kebutuhan buah tercukupi. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui fenologi pembungaan dan pembuahan R. mucronata di areal sumber benih teridentifikasi Dusun Pesisir, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur. Fenologi pembungaan, pembuahan, dan produksi propagula diamati pada tiga sampel pohon per petak ukur. Produksi propagula diamati dengan membuat petak ukur 5 x 5 m, dengan jarak antar petak ukur 100 m; yang dibedakan antara petak ukur di tepi pantai dan di tepi daratan. Total petak ukur yang diamati ada sebanyak sepuluh petak ukur. Pengambilan data diameter, tinggi total dan produksi propagula dilakukan untuk semua pohon dalam petak ukur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa R. mucronata berbunga selama pengamatan (Januari-April), dengan pembungaan yang tidak serempak dalam satu pohon. Siklus reproduksi memerlukan waktu 15-16 bulan mulai dari terbentuknya tunas sampai masaknya propagula; dengan puncak pembungaan terjadi pada bulan Maret-April dan musim berbuah pada bulan Agustus. Propagula mencapai tingkat masak siap dipanen pada bulan Desember-Januari.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Penelitian Hutan TanamanSame topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207