MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412675533 · doi:10.59075/ijss.v3i3.1895

Critical Discourse Analysis of the Symbolic Language in Shakespeare’s Selected Dark Lady Sonnets

2025· article· en· W4412675533 on OpenAlexaff
Iram Yousaf, Barkat Ali Abro, Azhar Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIndus journal of social sciences. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonnetLinguisticsLiteratureSociologyArtPhilosophyPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The English national poet William Shakespeare wrote 154 sonnets, which are commonly divided into three categories: the “Fair Youth Sonnets” (126 sonnets), the “Dark Lady Sonnets” (26 sonnets), and the “Greek Sonnet.”(02 sonnets). The current study aims to conduct a critical discourse analysis of the symbolic language employed in Shakespeare’s Dark Lady Sonnets. A content analysis method was adopted to examine the data. The study's population includes the 26 sonnets, known as “Dark Lady Sonnets”. Using a purposive sampling technique, the researchers selected six sonnets (127, 128, 129, 130, 131 and 132) from the Dark Lady collection as the sample for data analysis. The findings reveal that Shakespeare effectively utilized symbolic discourse throughout these selected sonnets. This study offers valuable insights and is expected to serve as a useful resource for future researchers and literary scholars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndus journal of social sciences.Same topicLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsFrench-language works237,207