MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412677259 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.26.666712

Rare k-mers reveal centromere haplogroups underlying human diversity and cancer translocations

2025· preprint· en· W4412677259 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yuichi Shiraishi, Yotaro Ochi, Masahiro Sugawa, Yoshitaka Sakamoto, Keisuke Kimura, Taro Tsujimura, Ai Okada, Rurika Okuda, Shinichi Namba, Tsubasa Miyauchi, Raúl Nicolás Mateos, Hajime Suzuki, Kenichi Chiba, Yu Ito, Wataru Nakamura, Fumiharu Ohka, Kazuya Motomura, Takuya Yamamoto, Yosuke Kawai, Yukinori Okada, Hiromichi Suzuki, Motohiro Kato, Ryuta Saito, Erik Garrison, Glennis A. Logsdon, Seishi Ogawa

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMoonshot Research and Development ProgramInstitute of GeneticsNational Human Genome Research InstituteJapan Science and Technology AgencyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of TokyoJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsHaplogroupChromosomal translocationCentromereDiversity (politics)BiologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsComputational biologyPolitical scienceGeneHaplotypeChromosomeAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Centromeres are among the most diverse and dynamically evolving regions of the human genome and are commonly affected in various human cancers. However, organized into highly repetitive α-satellite higher-order repeats (HORs), human centromere sequences have long resisted detailed genomic analysis. Although the development of long-read sequencing platforms has enabled the analysis of complete centromere sequences, their application to a large set of samples is still largely limited, preventing our understanding of centromere variation and haplotype structures across large human populations and the structural basis of centromere-involving translocations in cancer. Here we show that rare k-mers present in centromeric regions can serve as effective markers for dissecting the complexity of centromere structure, particularly that of active α-satellite HOR arrays (aHOR arrays), across human populations and for understanding centromere-involving abnormalities in cancer. Based on rare k-mer-based clustering, centromere aHOR arrays are clustered into discrete haplogroups (aHOR-HGs) with distinct structural features. These k-mers were also used to develop a framework that enables the inference of haplogroups in a given sample based on short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data (ascairn). By applying ascairn to large-scale human population datasets ( n > 3,300), we revealed the diversity of aHOR-HGs and their geographic histories across populations. The rare k-mer-based approach was also applied to investigate the structure of 1p/19q co-deletion, a highly recurrent centromere-involving translocation in IDH -mutated oligodendrogliomas. Analyzing short-read WGS data from 142 cases with 1p/19q co-deletion using rare k-mers, we showed that breakpoints of 1p/19q co-deletion were mapped to aHOR arrays in chromosomes 1 ( D1Z7 ) and 19 ( D19Z3 ), which was validated by long-read sequencing of two 1p/19q co-deletion-positive cases. Notably, the translocation preferentially involved haplogroups composed of haplotypes containing larger regions susceptible to rearrangement. These results highlight the role of rare k-mers in dissecting the complexity of centromere sequences and their evolutionary history as well as understanding centromere-involving abnormalities associated with human diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207