MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412680197 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.25.25331276

Neurobehavioral Assessment of Sensorimotor Function in Autism Using Smartphone Technology

2025· preprint· en· W4412680197 on OpenAlexaff
Kayleigh D. Gultig, Cornelis Peter Boele, Lotte Elizabeth Maria Roggeveen, Ting Fang Soong, Seth Sherry, Caroline Jung, Sara Milosevska, Anton Uvarov, Khalid Benhassan, S. Aït Benali, Tannia Valeria Carpio-Arias, Sander Lindeman, Sebastiaan K. E. Koekkoek, Esra Sefik, Myrthe J. Ottenhoff, Samuel S.‐H. Wang, Chris I. De Zeeuw, Abdeslem El Idrissi, Henk‐Jan Boele

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNvidiaZonMwPrinceton University
KeywordsAutismPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFunction (biology)Cognitive psychologyAudiologyComputer scienceDevelopmental psychologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Differences in sensorimotor processing represent an important, yet underrecognized, feature of autism; typically assessed through subjective observations, which are susceptible to biases. A more objective approach to quantify sensorimotor function may be possible through reflex- based neurobehavioral evaluations. The clinical application of these assessments has, however, been confined largely to laboratory settings. Thus, small sample sizes and inconsistent findings have made it challenging to understand how sensorimotor function differs in autism and whether it can be used as an objective biomarker for diagnostics. Here we present a novel smartphone-based platform to conduct neurobehavioral evaluations by measuring facial and behavioral responses in at-home environments. Through a multi-centre study, we explored the platform’s ability to distinguish between children with and without autism. We enrolled 536 children aged 3–12 years. BlinkLab smartphone-based assessments were successfully completed in 431 children (80.4%), including 275 with autism and 156 neurotypical children. We found that autistic children showed altered sensorimotor responses across multiple domains. These included reduced prepulse inhibition (PPI), stronger habituation over the course of a PPI test, more variable eyeblink responses to auditory stimuli and significant sensitization. Additionally, children with autism displayed more screen avoidance, postural instability, head movements, mouth openings, non-syllabic vocalizations, horizontal pupil shifts, "side-eyeing", and variation in baseline eyelid opening. Exploratory analyses showed that these effects were largely independent of co-occurring ADHD or intellectual disability. Notably, co-occurrence did influence certain subdomains (e.g., PPI, mouth openings). These findings illustrate that smartphone-based assessments can capture distinct sensorimotor profiles associated with autism in real-world environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→