MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412683290 · doi:10.7759/cureus.88864

Radiation Therapy for Primary Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman Disease of the Face: A Case Report Resistant to Multiple Lines of Treatment and a Literature Review

2025· review· en· W4412683290 on OpenAlexaff
O Navarro, Eduardo Cervera-Ceballos, Adela Poitevin‐Chacón, Hidralba Perez-Lopez, Fabiola Flores-Vázquez, Víctor I Urbalejo-Ceniceros, Jose A Arriaga-Marroquin, Alejandro Avilés‐Salas, Irving Sánchez, Alejandro Villalvazo, Enrique Gutiérrez, Tomas Faustino Gonzalez-Espinosa

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRosai–Dorfman diseaseDermatologyRadiation therapyDiseasePathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare subtype of sinus histiocytosis, with primary cutaneous RDD (PCRDD) being an even rarer form, characterized by cutaneous lesions without systemic involvement. PCRDD presents a significant diagnostic challenge and is often resistant to conventional therapies, including surgical resection, steroids, and chemotherapy. Currently, no established management guidelines exist for this condition. Radiation therapy is emerging as a promising treatment option, especially for refractory cases involving cosmetically sensitive or difficult-to-resect areas. This case report presents a patient with treatment-resistant PCRDD affecting the face, which was refractory to multiple therapeutic approaches, including chemotherapy. The patient achieved durable remission with radiation therapy at an 18-month follow-up, highlighting the efficacy of this modality in managing resistant PCRDD and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicHistiocytic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207