MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Living in the shadow of rural digital vulnerability: Navigating technology needs and resources

2025· article· en· W4412687592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rural Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicICT in Developing Communities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsShadow (psychology)Vulnerability (computing)Environmental planningBusinessSociologyGeographyEconomic growthEnvironmental resource managementComputer scienceComputer securityPsychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As internet access becomes increasingly required for full societal participation, the risks of digital exclusion are accentuated for some populations, such as rural citizens. The objective of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the digital experiences of rural residents in a Western Canadian province with differing broadband speeds. Participants were recruited in follow-up to an online survey which asked for interest in participation in focus groups to further discuss experiences with digital technologies. Rural adults (n = 32) with connectivity speeds both above and below the Canadian definition of high-speed participated in one of six focus groups. Transcripts from the recorded focus groups were thematically analyzed. The overarching theme that described participants' digital experiences was living in the shadow of rural digital vulnerability, or the interaction between their needs and available resources, with three sub-themes further detailing their experiences. Rural conditions threatened digital vulnerability, and produced harm when there was mis-alignment between participants’ needs and available resources. Compounding their susceptibility to vulnerability, were pressures to engage digitally, which participants described coming from services, work, and family and friends, and tech companies and emerging technology. Participants navigated threatened vulnerability by accommodating the technology to fit their lives and by adapting their lives to fit the technology within their infrastructure limitations . Overall, the digital experiences of rural residents highlight the role of context and individual agency in predisposition to risk, advancing a nuanced understanding of vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it