Fuzzy-Chaos Framework for Analyzing and Quantifying Uncertainty in Labour Productivity in Complex Construction Environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effective management of labour productivity in construction projects is important for ensuring project success.This paper introduces a novel approach to quantifying uncertainty in labour productivity through entropy calculations based on outputs from a fuzzy expert system.Two distinct scenarios are analyzed to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed methodology, one representing a week with high variability and the other a stable and predictable week.These scenarios highlight how entropy can be a powerful tool for identifying periods of high uncertainty and assisting project managers in making informed decisions about resource allocation, risk management, and strategic planning.The findings suggest that high entropy values indicate weeks requiring increased management attention and resources, whereas lower entropy values correspond to more stable conditions, allowing for standard operational procedures.This approach enhances understanding of dynamic project conditions and supports proactive project management practices.This study contributes to the body of knowledge by integrating fuzzy logic with entropy calculations, which offers a robust framework for managing the complexities of labour productivity in construction projects.Through realworld application and comparative analysis, this study validates the effectiveness of entropy analysis as a diagnostic and decision-making tool in the construction industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it