Non-Motor Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Isolated Dystonia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Dystonia, traditionally regarded as a purely motor disorder, is now increasingly recognized as involving clinically significant non-motor symptoms (NMSs) that can adversely affect patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to assess HRQoL in Romanian patients with isolated dystonia and to evaluate the impact of two key NMSs, depression and cognitive impairment, on their HRQoL. We hypothesized that depression would have a greater adverse effect on HRQoL than cognitive impairment. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 65 adult Romanian patients with isolated dystonia. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), including the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and cognitive impairment was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and parametric and non-parametric tests were used. Multiple regression analysis was employed to evaluate associations between NMS and HRQoL. Results: The mean (SD) age was 56.6 (14.3) years, and 80% of participants were female. Depression and cognitive function were significantly associated with PCS (0.33 and −0.51, respectively) and MCS (0.26 and −0.78, respectively). Multiple regression analysis showed that the two NMS explained 38% of the variance in PCS and 58% of the variance in MCS. Depression had a greater impact on PCS and MCS than cognitive impairment (−0.47 vs. 0.33 and −0.72 vs. 0.16, respectively). Cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26) was present in 35.4% of patients, while 46.2% had at least mild depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 5); 23.1% met criteria for moderate-to-severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Depressive symptoms showed strong negative correlations with all SF-36 domains, while cognitive performance correlated modestly. Conclusions: Both depression and cognitive impairment have a significant negative impact on HRQoL in dystonia, with depression having a stronger effect, as we hypothesized. Routine screening for non-motor symptoms is essential to support better clinical outcomes and enhance patients’ quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".