MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412694338 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c01751

Heteroatom-Tuned Carbon Dots for Multimode High-Resolution Fluorescence Imaging of Latent Imprints

2025· article· en· W4412694338 on OpenAlexaff
Jiu-Jiang Wang, Xiaosen Lv, Da-Wu Li, Jianghua Zhang, Jinke Han

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon and Quantum Dots Applications
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
FundersMinistry of Public Security of the People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Education of Liaoning ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
KeywordsHeteroatomChemistryFluorescenceNanotechnologyCarbon fibersFingerprint (computing)Composite numberComputer scienceMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fingerprints are recognized as one of the most reliable biometric features in forensic science. High-quality fingerprint imaging facilitates the extraction of essential personal information during examination and analysis. Here, we utilized the transfer mechanism between precursors and carbon dots (CDs) to synthesize wavelength-tunable fluorescent nanoparticles for developing latent fingerprints (LFPs). Experimental and theoretical results revealed that the precise design of the heteroatom-doped structure of carbon sources enabled the sequential introduction of heteroatoms to CDs, from oxygen alone, to bromine, chlorine, and finally nitrogen, which induced a gradual reduction of energy level gaps, thereby realizing adjustable fluorescence from green to red (538-612 nm). By combining CDs with diatomite, the resulting composite powders, available as multicolor fluorescence and daylight developers, demonstrated high sensitivity and selectivity for detecting both fresh and aging LFPs. Using a typical powdering method with CDs/diatomite stored for 30 days, level 1-3 fingerprint details were visualized with high contrast, and diversified latent imprints deposited on various substrates, including knuckle prints, palmprints, and footprints, were clearly developed. Furthermore, the developed multicolor enhancement technique ensured high-resolution details and overcame the challenges of poorly developed fingerprints. Thus, the proposed multimode framework establishes a viable platform for practical imprint imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicCarbon and Quantum Dots ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207