MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412697944 · doi:10.59465/jpht.v12i2.881

Model Volume Pohon Sengon Untuk Menilai Kehilangan Keuntungan Petani Hutan Rakyat

2015· article· id· W4412697944 on OpenAlexaff
Ari Ardelina, Tatang Tiryana, Muhdin Muhdin

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryVolume (thermodynamics)PhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sistem penjualan pohon sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria L.) di hutan rakyat tanpa menggunakan model volume pohon yang tepat dapat menimbulkan kehilangan keuntungan petani. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh model volume sengon dan mengevaluasi praktek yang biasa dilakukan dalam penjualan kayu sengon di hutan rakyat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model volume yang dapat digunakan secara akurat untuk memperkirakan volume pohon sengon di hutan rakyat dapat diduga dengan hanya mengukur diameter pohon. Sistem penjualan berdasarkan batangan dan luasan menyebabkan petani kehilangan keuntungan sebesar 24,99% dan 32,19%. Untuk menghindari kelemahan tersebut maka direkomendasikan model volume sebagai penduga volume pohon sengon dengan akurat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Penelitian Hutan TanamanSame topicPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesFrench-language works237,207