Estilo de Vida e Percepção da Dor de Adultos no Período Pré Cirurgia Cardíaca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O estudo avaliou o estilo de vida e a percepção da dor em adultos no período pré-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca, em um hospital de referência no interior do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Foi um estudo descritivo e transversal, realizado entre maio e agosto de 2022, com 26 participantes (idade média 61 anos), predominando o sexo feminino (n = 15). Foram utilizados questionários para coletar dados sociodemográficos, perfil clínico, percepção da dor (Questionário de Dor de McGill versão curta e Escala Visual Analógica) e estilo de vida (Estilo de Vida Fantástico). A média do índice de massa corporal indicou sobrepeso em ambos os sexos (29,06 ± 5,66). A maioria dos sujeitos relatou dor moderada (n = 15). Mulheres apresentaram melhores escores de estilo de vida (p = 0,016), destacando-se nos domínios Nutrição (p = 0,016) e Álcool (p = 0,004). Os resultados sugerem hábitos mais saudáveis entre mulheres comparadas aos homens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".