MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412699894 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt25.197

Computational Simulation of Heat Source Influence on Particulate Behavior and Deposition in Indoor Residential Room

2025· article· en· W4412699894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Benyamine Meberika, Naïma Fezzioui, Zebach Bachir

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesDeposition (geology)Environmental scienceComputer scienceChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The indoor air quality has recently been a major public concern.Several health effects are linked to this problem.The sub-Sharanian climate is characterized by violent winds causing the transport and deposition of sand particles and desert dust in buildings.The results of several studies have shown that the air conditioning (air heaters) and the radiator systems is the main contributor to the problem of indoor pollution and the health of the occupants.The objective of this work is to assess the indoor air quality of a building by studying the movement of particles in a living room driven by two different heating systems.In this work, the flow of natural fluid-particles was simulated employing the Eulerian-Lagrangian CFD-DPM framework.The effect of the particle motion and deposition rate on the indoor air quality was explored considering two different heating systems and the particle size.The research demonstrated that particle behavior is fundamentally governed by two critical factors: instantaneous fluid velocity within heating systems and specific particle size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207