MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412699900 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt25.231

Numerical Study of Nanofluid-Based Cooling in Porous-Finned Enclosures

2025· article· en· W4412699900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pankaj Kumar, AR Shanmugam, Ki Sun Park

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidMaterials sciencePorosityPorous mediumMechanicsThermodynamicsHeat transferComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal management remains a critical challenge in compact, high-power electronic devices, where conventional cooling methods that use base fluids often prove inadequate.This study proposes a numerical investigation of laminar mixed convection in cubical enclosures integrating nanofluids, porous media, and solid fins to enhance heat dissipation.The work employs an in-house computational code in C, solving the biharmonic formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations on a nonuniform grid [1] to resolve complex flow and thermal interactions between multiple domains: a nanofluid (e.g., Al2O3/water), a porous base layer, and three vertically mounted solid fins coated with porous material.Nanofluids, suspensions of nanoparticles typically consisting of 100-1000 atoms dispersed in base fluids, exhibit enhanced thermal conductivity with a reduced likelihood of microchannel clogging due to their sub-micron scale [2].In addition, their lower particle momentum minimizes erosion risks compared to larger additives [3].The thermophysical properties essential for modelling nanofluid behaviour, such as thermal conductivity and viscosity, are derived from established correlations that consider variations in particle size, concentration, and temperature [3].These properties are crucial for simulations aimed at optimizing heat transfer while reducing the flow resistance caused by viscosity.The solver addresses conjugate heat transfer across fluid, porous, and solid zones under thermal equilibrium conditions.Active cooling was modelled via inlet/outlet flow, whereas the biharmonic approach improved the numerical stability for high Reynolds and Richardson number flows.A nonuniform grid ensures precise resolution of the boundary layers near fins and porous interfaces.Key parameters include nanoparticle concentration (0-5% vol.), porous permeability (Darcy number: 10 -5 -10 -2 ), and fin geometry.The study evaluates heat transfer rates, velocity fields, and entropy generation to assess thermodynamic efficiency.The findings of this research enhance our understanding of how nanofluids interact with porous-finned structures to optimize thermal performance.By substituting traditional fluids [4] with nanofluids, we anticipate that the increased thermal conductivity and micro convection driven by nanoparticles will significantly improve heat transfer.The biharmonic formulation specifically addresses the coupling of stream function and velocity in multi-domain systems, while entropy analysis effectively quantifies the irreversible losses associated with heat exchange, fluid friction, and the influence of nanoparticles.This will help us build more effective cooling by establishing an optimal balance between nanoparticle loading (to prevent viscosity penalties) and fin-porous designs (to enhance surface area utilization).This study introduces a novel computational framework that significantly improves the modelling of conjugate heat transfer in heterogeneous media, providing important insights into the interactions between nanofluids and porous materials, a topic that has been rarely explored in prior studies.Future initiatives will focus on validating these simulations against benchmark cases and experimental data, with applications to electronics, energy systems, and aerospace thermal management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207