MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412700058 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt25.148

Process Level Investigation of the Flue Gas Latent Heat Recovery Using a Condensing Heat Exchanger in a Biomass-Fired Boiler

2025· article· en· W4412700058 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zaina Abrahams, Leon Malan, Pieter Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoiler (water heating)Flue gasHeat exchangerEnvironmental scienceWaste managementWaste heat recovery unitHeat recovery ventilationLatent heatProcess engineeringNuclear engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomass-fired boilers offer an alternative to the use of fossil fuels.The relatively high moisture content in biomass fuels results in the flue gas containing a large amount of water vapour following the combustion process within the boiler.Unused latent heat in the water vapour decreases the overall boiler efficiency.One way to recover some of the lost latent heat is to condense the moisture out of the flue gas stream.The condensation process is a complex combined heat and mass transfer process, in which the flue gas can be considered a mixture of water vapour and non-condensable (NC) gases.The presence of NC gases has proven to inhibit the condensation heat and mass transfer rate [1].Furthermore, the mass transfer results in a decrease in the water vapour content which causes a corresponding reduction in the partial pressure and saturation temperature of the flue gas.This can result in large variations in the water vapour volume, heat transfer coefficient, and specific heat capacity of the flue gas along the flow path [2].Many researchers have used variations of the Colburn-Hougen method [3] to model the flue gas condensation process for different applications.Rczka and Wjs [4] conducted a study comparing a modified Colburn-Hougen model and the VDI algorithm [5].This was used to model a flue gas condensing heat exchanger within a 900 MWe coal-fired boiler.They considered the VDI algorithm to be the preferred method as it accounts more accurately for mass transfer.In this research, a steady-state, one-dimensional thermofluid process model of a flue gas condensing heat exchanger is developed using the VDI algorithm.It is integrated within an existing whole-boiler process model firing sugarcane bagasse, developed by Rousseau et al. [6] for an operating John Thompson boiler with a maximum continuous rating of 29 kg/s of steam at 3 MPa and 400C.This is used to evaluate the impact of the heat exchanger on important boiler process parameters, including the flue gas latent heat recovery and overall improvement in boiler efficiency.Perspectives on the technical feasibility and design decisions for prototype development of the flue gas condensing heat exchanger are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207