MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412700485 · doi:10.3390/antib14030064

Determination of the Epitopes of Alpha-Glucosidase Anti-Drug Antibodies in Pompe Disease Patient Plasma Samples

2025· article· en· W4412700485 on OpenAlexafffund
Evgeniy V. Petrotchenko, Andreas Hahn, Christoph H. Borchers

Bibliographic record

VenueAntibodies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersJewish General HospitalFondation De Famille Alvin SegalGenome CanadaWarren Y. Soper Charitable TrustMcGill University
KeywordsEpitopeRecombinant DNAEnzyme replacement therapyGlycogen storage disease type IIAntibodyEnzymeAntigenDrugVirologyBiologyChemistryDiseaseMolecular biologyBiochemistryPharmacologyImmunologyMedicineInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pompe disease is a rare autosomal-recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA), leading to the pathological accumulation of glycogen and impaired autophagy. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human alpha-glucosidase (rhGAA) has been available since 2006, but may lead to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against the recombinant human enzyme, which, in turn, may adversely affect the response to ERT. Knowledge of the antigenic determinants of rhGAA involved in interaction with ADAs may facilitate the development of strategies to attenuate the anti-drug immune response in patients. Here, we determined the rhGAA ADA epitopes in the plasma of Pompe disease patients using a series of affinity purifications combined with epitope extraction and label free quantitation LC-MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntibodiesSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207