MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412702991 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325072

Intelligent surgical drainage - digitizing the analysis of drainage fluid in patients with surgical drains

2025· article· en· W4412702991 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Kunert, Jana Jeske, Thanusiah Selvamoorthy, Felix Nensa, Bernadette Hosters, Michael F. Berger, Ramsi Siaj, Mario Vincent Roser

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemoglobinBilirubinDrainageNuclear medicineHematocritAmylaseLinear regressionMedicineBiomedical engineeringChromatographySurgeryChemistryMathematicsInternal medicineStatisticsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surgical drains are essential in post-operative care, where timely removal is critical to prevent complications. Early removal can result in seromas and hematomas, while delayed removal may lead to infections. Traditional manual analysis of drain output is time-consuming and often unreliable, necessitating a shift towards digital methods. This study used a compact mini-spectrometer to analyze surgical drain output quickly and non-invasively. The spectrometer operates in the 340-850 nm range with 288 discrete detection channels. A total of 528 samples were collected from 181 patients aged 0-85 years. Fourteen laboratory parameters, including albumin, amylase, bilirubin, total protein, LDH, lipase, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and triglycerides were analyzed. Notable correlations were observed for several parameters. This study employed correlation, regression and classification analyses to investigate the relationships between various biochemical laboratory parameters in drain output and their absorption peaks at specific wavelengths. The data obtained from standard procedures in a certified central laboratory were compared with data collected using the mini-spectrometer. Significant correlations were found, particularly for hemoglobin and erythrocytes at 586 nm (r = -0.67 and r = -0.46, respectively). Hemoglobin also correlated with wavelengths at 514 nm (r = -0.62) and 557 nm (r = -0.45). Bilirubin showed peaks at 582 nm (r = 0.56) and 496 nm (r = -0.49). Regression and classification models, incorporating random effects, provided enhanced performance. The classification models effectively differentiated between pathological and non-pathological values, with hemoglobin showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947 and a Balanced Accuracy (BAC) of 0.853. Triglycerides had an AUC of 0.941 and a BAC of 0.789. Models for LDH, bilirubin, and erythrocytes also achieved AUC values over 0.9, with BAC values exceeding 0.79. This study demonstrates the potential of mini-spectrometers integrated into surgical drains to improve post-operative drainage management, potentially offering faster, more reliable analyses compared to traditional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207