A resource of RNA-binding protein motifs across eukaryotes reveals evolutionary dynamics and gene-regulatory function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key regulators of gene expression; however, their RNA-binding specificities, that is, motifs, have not been comprehensively determined. Here we introduce Eukaryotic Protein-RNA Interactions (EuPRI), a freely available resource of RNA motifs for 34,746 RBPs from 690 eukaryotes. EuPRI includes in vitro binding data for 504 RBPs, including newly collected RNAcompete data for 174 RBPs, along with thousands of predicted motifs. We predict these motifs with an algorithm, Joint Protein-Ligand Embedding, which can detect distant homology relationships and map specificity-determining peptides. EuPRI quadruples the number of available RBP motifs, expanding the motif repertoire across all major eukaryotic clades and assigning motifs to the majority of human RBPs. We demonstrate the utility of EuPRI for inferring post-transcriptional function and evolutionary relationships by identifying rapid, recent evolution of post-transcriptional regulatory networks in worms and plants, in contrast to the vertebrate RNA motif set, which has remained relatively stable after a large expansion between the metazoan and vertebrate ancestors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".