Lung Tissue Compliance Interacts with Smooth Muscle and Drives Hyperresponsiveness in Mice with Experimental Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A recent study on BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice demonstrated a clear lack of association between the in vivo response to nebulized methacholine and the degree of airway narrowing ex vivo in a model of asthma induced by a daily exposure to house dust mite over 10 consecutive days. This finding raises the question of which factors determine the methacholine response in vivo. METHODS: Herein, multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine which baseline physiological characteristics are associated with the methacholine response. RESULTS: Among the 10 baseline characteristics studied, and depending on how the methacholine response was monitored during a concentration-response, lung tissue compliance was the most commonly and robustly associated with the methacholine response. Inspiratory capacity was the second most frequently associated. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that lung tissue compliance and inspiratory capacity may be two important determinants of the methacholine response in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice with and without experimental asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".