AI-Optimized Warehouse Systems: Combining AGVs, RFID Technology, Zigbee Networks, and Agent-based Simulation Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An AI-based system is proposed for automating warehousing processes regarding Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Zigbee networks, and Agent-Based Simulation Models. It tends to optimize efficiency, scalability, and flexibility for current supply chain scenarios. Self-operating material handling AGVs, RFID for on-time inventory update, Zigbee for optimal device-to-device communication, and agent-based models for process simulation and optimization are implemented. Key performance indicator-based performance evaluation detects improved performance 94% accuracy, 95% F1 score, and 92% scalability compared with traditional optimization techniques such as CSO, ACS, and WOA. Improvements guarantee better anomaly detection and improved operational effectiveness. The structure successfully transforms regular warehouse systems to intelligent, data-driven spaces to make real-time decisions and undergo adaptive logistics with improved sustainability and scalability in smart warehouse operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".