Low-energy H- beam injectors for particle accelerators: upgrade requirements, challenges and future plans [Slides]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High brightness, negative hydrogen ion sources are used extensively in large, accelerator-based, user facilities operating worldwide. Negative hydrogen beams have become the preferred means of filling circular accelerators and storage rings as well as enabling efficient extraction from cyclotrons. Much larger beams of H- ions are also utilized for neutral beams injection into fusion machines and will be discussed in a separate companion presentation. Some of the accelerator facilities include the US Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC), Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL-ISIS), Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE), Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), the CERN LHC injector, the Chinese Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) as well as numerous installations of D-Pace (licenced by TRIUMF) ion sources used mainly with cyclotrons. Many facilities are currently working on various improvement / upgrade projects, both in the near and long term, which are driving further development of their ion source and LEBT (Low Energy Beam Transport) and, in some cases, their overall front end injector system. This report will first provide a simple description of each facilities existing ion source and LEBT and summarize the operational parameters which are currently being routinely injected into their accelerators. Next, the parametric goals of each of the facilities upgrade projects are specified as well as development efforts currently underway to meet these requirement and improvement goals. It is hoped that that this work will not only capture the current state-of-the-art of worldwide H- beam injectors and clarify the research goals and efforts of the community in general but will also encourage further inter laboratory collaborations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".